Mean Time to Detect
1.8m
Optimal
False Positive Rate
2.3%
+0.3%
Security Score
A+
Top Tier
Key Performance Indicators
Patch Compliance
Response Time
Performance Improvements
Implementation Impact
Detection Rate
85% → 98.7%Response Time
5.2m → 1.8mFalse Positive Rate
8.5% → 2.3%Patch Compliance
78% → 95%Security Performance Trends
Six-month security performance comparison showing the impact of system implementation. Detection rates improved from 85% to 98.7%, while response times decreased from 5.2m to 1.8m. False positive rates were reduced by 72.9%, and patch compliance increased by 21.8%. The trend lines demonstrate consistent improvement across all security metrics.
Monthly Highlights
Threats Detected
Last 30 daysAverage Response
Time to resolutionSystem Uptime
AvailabilityComparative Performance Analysis
| Benchmark Type | Classical | Quantum | Speedup | Status | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern Recognition | 450ms | 120ms | 3.75x | Optimal | QPR-2024 |
| Threat Detection | 850ms | 180ms | 4.72x | Optimal | QETD-2024 |
| Encryption Protocol | 2100ms | 380ms | 5.52x | Optimal | PQC-2024 |
| Network Analysis | 1250ms | 290ms | 4.31x | Near-Optimal | QNS-2024 |
| Risk Assessment | 3200ms | 580ms | 5.52x | Optimal | QRAF-2024 |